After much deliberation and careful consideration by a highly experienced panel of judges, a design developed by of team of five young graduates in architecture and art was chosen. Four members of the team are all part of Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios in London, with the fifth member being Devon based artist Edward Crumpton.
The panel felt their winning design cleverly delivered on all the criteria of the competition and produced an elegant structure, that although contemporary in form is rich in texture, tradition and personality. The structures are crafted from sustainable materials and are respectful to their environments. Initially a striking silhouette in the landscape, they slowly reveal themselves as you approach, with an exterior surface of charred wood cladding, complex woven tarred marlin rope screens and subtle interior detailing. These quiet spaces will provide a retreat for the resident artist and a place of discovery for passers-by.
The winners stated that: Our design aspires to articulate the collaborative process, between architecture and art, which epitomizes this competition’s ethos, with a highly crafted and distinctive proposal for The Observatory. We’ve taken an aesthetic approach that is informed by the natural beauty of sustainable materials, the unique characteristics of the sites and the tripartite narrative between the resident artist, general public and wider landscape. With rigorous research, attention to detail and inter-disciplinary collaboration, we aim to realise a project of exceptional design quality that creates moments of meaningful engagement for everyone that has a chance to look upon, into or out of The Observatory. The Study and The Workshop, are responsive to the landscape through their ability to rotate. This will allow the structures to act as shifting framing devices to the landscape beyond and encourage the artist and audiences to interact by blurring the boundaries between public and private.
The resident artists will be able to orientate The Observatory to take maximum advantage of daylight and vistas, or to create shelter from the prevailing weather. The Study will provide a private and reflective space for the artists to work, while The Workshop will allow for a range of interaction with the general public.The Observatory will arrive pre-fabricated to site, the light-touch and simple installation methods causing minimum disruption and disturbance during installation and removal.
Charlotte Knight, of the winning team, said: “The team and I have been through a fantastic journey over the last few months and I cannot thank Mina, Lauren, Ross and Ed enough for their incredible hard work and dedication. Our work would not have been possible without the continuous support of everyone at Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios and Jane Wernick Associates. We are overjoyed to have been chosen from a selection of such strong entries and we are now thoroughly looking forward to the next step of working with Mark and the team at SPUD in order to realise The Observatory.”
Mark Drury of SPUD said: “we’ve been overwhelmed with the high quality of entries received for the competition and making a decision was incredibly tough. We are delighted with the winning design and look forward to developing The Observatory with such a young, enthusiastic and energetic team of designers.”
The project team is currently working on securing all the funding to deliver the £50,000 construction and installation costs of The Observatory, plus funding for the residencies and engagement programme. A crowd-funding page will launch soon and we would be delighted to hear from potential sponsors for the programme.
Images from top to bottom:
The Studio and Workshop shown on location at Lymington Salt Marshes
The design team working on the various constructin materials, inlcuding the charred wood cladding amd knotted marlin rope
Illustrations to show how the two structures can independently rotate to take advantage of daylight and vistas and respond to the varied landscapes
The interior of the Study and Workshop spaces
Top right: The Design Team - including Edward Crumpton, Charlotte Knight, Mina Gospavic, Lauren Shevills, Ross Galtress
Observatory Design Competition
Now Closed - sign up to the Newsletter for latest competition announcements
The structure of ‘The Observatory’ will be determined through a design competition open to teams of architects and artists across the UK and Internationally.
The nature of the competition will require architecture practices to demonstrate effective partnerships and involvement with artists as part of their design process. The teams may also include engineers and students artists and architects.
The design brief sets out the requirements for a ‘structure’ that will provide shelter for an artists to work in. As the structure will move location up to 3 times it will need to be demountable and cable of being easily moved on a lorry and potentially be re-configurable to suit the needs and geography of the new site.
The use of a competition format will lead to a broad range of new and possibly unique ideas. It will help push the experimental nature of the project and encourage teams to explore new materials and ways of creating temporary, movable structures.
For more information and updates please join our Mailing List
Congratulations to the following 5 teams on being short-listed for the Observatory Project. We received some some really great entries and the judges very much enjoyed looking through all of the proposals. Interviews and a selection of the winning design will take place on 3rd April.
The Competition has now closed and we are starting to long-list entries.
We are delighted to announce the following teams have been long-listed for the Observatory Competition. There has been a fantastic response to the competiton and we are grateful for the hard-work everyone has put into their fabulous ideas.
The images below show only one of the teams entry boards. Please click on the image to see an enlarged image and team members names.
The judging panel:
Will Alsop - Director/Architect - All Design, London
Bill Woodrow - Artist/Scultor, London and Hampshire
Wendy Perring - Director/Architect - PAD Studio, Lymington
Professor Lorraine Farrelly - Deputy Head, School of Architecture, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth
Ruth Slavid - Editor, Landscape Journal and freelance writer, London
James O’Callaghan - Director/Structural Engineer, Eckersley O’Callaghan, Winchester/London
Paula Orrell - Artistic Director, River Tamar Project
This short film gives a flavour of the Obsworkatory weekend from the participants point of view.
Created by Ricky Evans and Phil Smith
Obsworkatory Weekend, Nov 2013 - Outcomes:
As part of the emerging Observatory Project and development work, SPUD organized an intensive workshop weekend called the OBSWORKATORY. The weekend, held at Artsway in the New Forest, was attended by over 30 artists, architects, students (from AUB and Portsmouth Universities) and other professionals. The aim of the workshop being to explore potential sites for the Observatory structure and to unpack two key questions:
Participants visited sites at Lymington Salt Marshes and Winchester Science Centre (at the Western end of the South Downs). The weather was wild and stormy and certainly made people think about siting a suitable structure in extreme conditions and the level of protection from the elements it would need to afford the artists. The site visits looked at the physical, geographical, environmental and social opportunities and limitations. The day very quickly generated intense discussions and ideas soon began to formulate. It was clear that both sites offered really exciting opportunities for both interdisciplinary collaboration, the residencies and audience engagement.
The day was spent working in teams in the gallery spaces at Artsway. This was a chance to reflect on the site visit and begin to explore the idea of residency and the needs of the artist and to begin to understand how the Observatory structure might facilitate this. Stimulation conversation emerged around the actual idea and concept of ‘observation’- how could the structure facilitate, inhibit, enhance or restrict this notion. There was also much discussion around the practicalities including access, costs, location and flexibility.
Key Outcomes from the weekend were (in no order of priority):
Shelter: providing protection, comfort, basic requirements, and the need to be flexible and usable seasonally
Permeability: providing an interface with an audience; allowing both physical and electronic access; creating a level of privacy and security to allow the artists to work
Observation: that this could be more than just visual and include sound, touch, temperature and even smell. Should the structure determine the views, orientation and opportunities for observation? Observation should be seen as up and down, outwards and inwards, macro and micro
Landmark: To create a beacon, identity, icon. The structure to have a visual impact and that scale, texture and colour should all be considered. It should have a functional and aesthetic balance. That it should work with the landscape.
Personalisation: should the artist(s) be allowed to change the structure/space on a temporary or permanent basis. Should the interior of the structure ne refreshed after each residency or allowed to evolve. Can the artists leave a mark/trace on the structure? Is there a budget for each location that allows the artists to physically change and personalize the space? Is this achieved through modular components that can be added or removed?
Energy: What renewable could be incorporated? Solar and wind – opportunities for sponsorship. What basic needs do the artists have. Can the use of renewables reference local issues. How will warmth and lighting be provided during colder, darker months?
Public interaction: When and how will this happen? Will it be according to a schedule/programmed activities? What degree of privacy is provided for the artist and can there be a system for announcing the artist is at ‘home’ – a flag for example. How are incidental visits managed, ensuring an unplanned level of public access.
Movement: the ability for the structure to turn and orientate to the sun, prevailing winds etc. Can this also help facilitate power generation. Is this entirely flexible or set within fixed parameters (i.e. timed, measured etc). This also needs to consider the relocation of the structure and the costs and issues related to this.
Structure: could be movable, flexible, made up of multiple structures, mobile and transportable, containing multiple zones, created from new materials, incorporating sustainable/recycled materials, able to fit on a specified trailer size, through access gates and under road bridges etc.
Residency: a call for all 12 artists made at the start of the programme. The finalization of artists agreed for Year 1 with potential amendments for Year 2. Should artists run consecutively in each location or could a group of artists collaborate and set their own timings/usage over a 6 month period. Can more than one artist use the space simultaneously. Opportunities fro showcasing work at the end of each 6 month location through partnerships with local galleries and other key locations. All the residencies contribute to a final conference event and publication. Provision of programmed on-sight workshops and activities. What parameters, if any, will be set in terms of the extent of the area that the artist can observe?
The abve images were created by artist Kimvi Nguyen as part of the Obsworkatory weekend. Kimvi uses found objects to create quick drawings, which are then captured using photography before being reconfigured http://kimvi.co.uk
Below: Images from the Obsworkatory workshops held at Artsway